I think someone changed the rules while I slept or perhaps I missed the class on Demo-Capitalism.
Within a free market economy ,as the US and the UK claim to have, the market is king! It determines who profits and who doesn’t. Selection by competitiveness is proclaimed to be the prevailing law.
Yet in this current crises in the global economy , these governments (and others) are going against the very rules of free market economics that they claim to be abide. By using unbelievable sums of public money to shore up the losses of private enterprise, they have tampered with a system, though fundamentally flawed and unsustainable, does have a weirdly fair way of self correction. Simply put, the free market weeds out those participants who, by the change in demand OR by making overwhelmingly bad decisions and business practice, are weakened and failing. Call it free market natural selection. The bailouts and so called stimulus packages are not only wrong, they are obscene and a spiked gloved slap in the face of those already peddled by the State in the name of free markets. Obscene because by their actions , future generations are condemned to penury and phenomenal national debt.
Government gutlessness is a disease caused , in part, by a lack of social conscience and an intrinsic incompetence in the running of a fair social system. We, the people, simply ask that the government take our taxes and provide for our common needs. We mandate them , with our votes, to protect us as from those to whom we are simply donors to be bled. We ask them to exercise their legislative and regulatory powers (which, by the way, they get from us) to ensure that we, the people, are not exploited, poisoned and abused. In this key task, they failed.
This failure , borne from the unhealthy alliance between elite, big money and politics, is supported by a complacent population, who care about what happens to them and their country, but not enough to do anything to change it.
This gross failure, terrible as it is, pales in comparison to what these gutless governments have done instead. They have taken our hard earned taxes from this and future generations and poured it into saving the very private corporations that have exploited and profited from us. This is equivalent to compensating the rapist with the victim’s wages. It would be a black comedy if it wasn’t so damn tragic.
The right thing to do is let the cards fall where they may. Let the companies that screwed up and gorged on greed, fail. Strengthen the social system to catch those cast aside by those failures. It would cost less to provide social aid to all those who have lost their jobs from the collapse of failed corporations (for the rest of their natural lives!), than it is costing to bail the companies out.
Rather than pump new money into a failed system, be brave and use a fraction of the bailout money to fund a new , fairer and sustainable system.
Let the businesses that were built on unsustainable and unrealistic models fail. Failure is an integral part of free market economics. It is the inbuilt and natural system of self improvement. Yet our gutless governments crumble in light of what they should do.
This crises is a golden opportunity to repair the foundations of our society. Sure money will be spent, but by bailing out failed and failing greed-mongers, it will be badly spent.
Instead of bailing out car manufacturers (there are too many cars on the roads anyway), invest public money in revolutionary public transport systems based on sustainable and self generating energy, that encourage an active lifestyle and low environmental impact.
Instead of encouraging unrealistic levels of home ownership and profiting from the ensuing unsustainable mortgage markets that plunge people into unrecoverable debt, invest public money in public housing that embraces and fosters community and sustainable living.
Instead of pouring money into short term measures like a reduction in VAT, use taxes wisely on progressive educational policies and a health care system that cares about the health of the country and is equitable to all.
Instead of bailing out banks and investment firms that screwed us all, create community based public lending institutions with public money that lend at a grassroots level in accordance with sound and fair practices (and if those don’t exist, create them!).
Better still, hasten their departure by giving them three months to fully and publicly disclose the extent of their losses and therefore show the world that they (mostly) are incapable of resuming any kind of appreciable level of lending. If they do not comply, revoke their banking license and shut them down.
Take radical action to get more value for money from the unprecedented levels of public money that is poured into the National Healthcare Service, lose the horde of incompetent managers and pay nurses more, fund and foster a holistic approach to care that treats people as human beings and not just as patients.
Instead of being complicit in the destruction of domestic manufacturing and production in favour of ‘cheap’ foreign imports (their true cost, when externalisation of cost to the environment and to its workers is factored is far greater) , re-invest in training and supporting the domestic manufacturing base. Do it now, before we lose the knowledge of how to manufacture. Sure, the goods will be more expensive – but they are made here, to our standards and our tastes. They keep jobs in our communities and the government can legislate that profit stays in our economy too. Its called protectionism and we are led to believe it is unfair trading practice. But if our government was not elected to protect us, then what the hell are they good for? Of course there are some things that are not feasible to produce here (not because we can’t but because the true cost of doing so makes it unsustainable) and those can form the basis of fairer international trade.
Instead of selling our sensitive industries to the highest bidder and divorcing government policy from its primary responsibilities, protect those essential aspects of our social and economic lives. Create a list of national security assets – basic universal healthcare, energy, security, transport , basic financial services , education and the environment. All those assets which, if interrupted or jeopardised, would cause our societies to come to a halt. Treat them exceptionally – fund them with public money and make them work (they are not supposed to be profitable!), protect their independence by barring private or foreign and therefore , profit-driven ownership (partial or otherwise). Invest in the skills to run them, service them and keep them fit for purpose. It is possible to have well run and financially accountable public systems, it takes guts and passion and a commitment to make a difference for the whole of Britain, not just the rich!
These are not revolutionary and rare ideas, they are clear as day to the fair mind. They require courage because they go against the interests of the elite, they require tenacity because they cause transformational change in the collective personality and such change takes time, they require vision that is unencumbered by a need to be re-elected or even popular in the short term. Everything they require has hitherto been lacking in our succession of gutless governments.
Ironically , perhaps the most gutsy leader of Britain in the modern age has been Margaret Thatcher – and before my peers razzle me for going over to the dark side, let me explain my thinking. She oversaw massive privatisation of public assets – that was wrong but hugely gutsy. That said, it was fairly gutless to release them to profiteers rather than reform them.
So, finally , I question why have the bailout and the answer I find, in the media and from the government, is that to allow these corporations to fail would erode the trust in the system and the economy. In case they hadn’t noticed – no one trusts the banks (and we haven’t for a long time) and we all know the economy is screwed – read as ‘recession’. We know it and our trading partners know it. Perhaps a better way to encourage trust is to communicate fairness to the world. To say that we will not bet the future earnings of our people on the fate of a handful of greedy bankers (as Gordon Brown and his chums are doing). That we are willing to take the short term hit of job losses for the long term health of a fairer , more sustainable financial system. But, cynically perhaps, I believe this is simply impossible to expect from our gutless governments.
One thought on “Gutless Government Part 1”
Yah to all that. The bottom line being that a change of government in itself will not suffice to address these issues and bring about the change we seek. No offence to Obamamaniacs (who think that his pesidency will finish JFK’s work), but the changes we need have to be institutional i.e the sort that will outlast the premature or termly exit of the leader. Real change cannot be delivered by one person or administration or system without the pro-active mandate of we who are governed, and therein, as you say lies the issue.